Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Johnson v. Duffy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02220
Respondent: Warden Edward Duffy and Eric Schneiderman
Ato. Ra Ajah-EL Ex Rel: Rohan Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Ponce Deleon Federal Bank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00145
Respondent: Giovanni L. Escobedo, John and Jane Does 1-50, Mario Pastorino and others
Counter Defendant: Rohan Anthony Johnson
Petitioner: Rohan Anthony Johnson
Counter Claimant: Mario Pastorino and Ponce Deleon Federal Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Johnson
as 13-4148
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Lashirelle Bryant and Jamie McGowan
Defendant - Appellant: Anthony Johnson
Sanders et al
as 1:2012cv09119
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Sanders and Anthony Johnson
Defendant: The City of New York , Carmen Torres-Ortiz, Michael Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Bakery and Confectionary Union
as 12-4861
Plaintiff - Appellee: Phillip G. Scott, individually and as representative on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and Terry Wayne Finch, individually and as representative on behalf of a class of similarly situated parties
Defendant - Appellant: Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Pension Fund, Steven Bertelli, in his official capacity as Trustee, Richard B. Cook, in his official capacity as Trustee and others
Alcantara v. Bakery and Confectionery Union We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4834
Plaintiff - Appellee: Rafael Alcantara, Individually, and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Alonso Gomez, Individually, and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Celestino Juarez, Individually, and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan, Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund Board of Trustees, as Plan Administrator, John Does 3-10, as Trustees of the Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Pension Fund and others
Moran v. City of New York
as 12-4583
Plaintiff - Appellee: Matthew Moran, Megan Cox, Michelle Borok and others
Defendant - Appellant: City of New York, John and Jane Does, Police Officers 1-50, individually and in their official capacities, Shawn Allen, Police Officer and others
Tikkun v. City of New York
as 12-4487
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kaitlyn Tikkun
Defendant: Martin F. Horn, Commissioner, New York City Department of Correction, Robert N. Davoren, Chief of Department, New York City Department of Correction, Robert Roes, New York City Department of Correction Supervisors and Commanders 1-50 and others
Defendant - Appellant: City of New York, a municipal entity, Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York, Raymond Kelly, New York City Police Commissioner and others
Stark v. The City of New York
as 12-4453
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jeffrey Stark, Rebecca Heinegg, D.K. Pan and others
Defendant: P.O. "John" Buccanero, Deputy Chief Thomas Purtell and David Cohen, Deputy Commissioner
Defendant - Appellant: City of New York, The Hudson River Park Trust, Police Officers John and Jane Doe #1-50, individually and in their official capacities(the names John and Jane Doe being ficticious, as the true names are presently unknown) and others
Crotty v. The City of New York
as 12-4480
Plaintiff - Appellee: Emilia Crotty, Naomi Podber, Heather Blackburn and others
Defendant: Kavita Kulkarni, Thomas Purtell, Deputy Chief, Robert Martin, P.O. and others
Defendant - Appellant: The City of New York, The Hudson River Park Trust, John and Jane Does, Police Officers #1-50 Individually and in their official capacities, (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?