Cases 21 - 30 of 178
Tenemille v. Town of Ramapo
as 22-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ernst Theodore Tenemille and Ernst Tenemille
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Ramapo, Christopher St. Lawrence, Ex-Town Supervisor, Patrick Withers, Councilman and others
Salaverria v. The United States of America
as 22-1190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant / Appellee:
The United States of America, Department of Justice of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, (USDHS), Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Defendant:
Retired Agent Jeffrey James Mumaugh, Under Cover, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (ICE), Director Tae D. Johnson, All Arresting Officers, Present at Illegal Arrest, September 7, 2021 and others
Diaz v. New York City Midtown West Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Johnny Diaz
Defendant:
New York City Midtown West Police Department, NYPD Sgt John Doe, NYPD Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jok v. City of Burlington, Ver
as 22-413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mabior Jok
Defendant:
Jason Bellavance, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont and Janine Wright, individually and in her official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Burlington, Vermont, Brandon del Pozo, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Burlington, Vermont and Joseph Corrow, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont
Meli v. City of Burlington, Vermont
as 22-423
Plaintiff:
Albin Meli
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charlie Meli
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jeremie Meli
Defendant:
Cory Campbell, individually and in his office capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Burlington, Vermont, Brandon del Pozo, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Burlington, Vermont and Jason Bellavance, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont
Diaz v. New York City Midtown West Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Johnny Diaz
Defendant:
New York City Midtown West Police Department, NYPD Sgt John Doe, NYPD Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meli v. City of Burlington, Vermont
as 22-528
Plaintiff:
Albin Meli and Jeremie Meli
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charlie Meli
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Burlington, Vermont, Brandon del Pozo, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Burlington, Vermont, Jason Bellavance, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Burlington, Vermont and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Salaverria v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv09254
Plaintiff:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant:
The United States of America, Department of Homeland Security (USDHS), Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 21-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Michael Cerminario, badge #1301, individually and in his official capacity, City of Utica, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity, Honorable Scott D. McNamara, Oneida County District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity, Grant Garramone, Assistant District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
