Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Hines et al v. Columbia et al
as 3:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Shameka Hines
Defendant:
District of Columbia and Skull & Bones Associations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 21-1446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, by its Attorney General, William M. Tong
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., City of New York and State of New York, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin and District of Columbia
Finnegan v. District of Columbia Superior Court et al
as 1:2021cv10946
Plaintiff:
Sean Matthew Finnegan
Defendant:
District of Columbia Superior Court and Gregory Meiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
