Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Selective Insurance Company of America v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00441
Plaintiff: Selective Insurance Company of America and Selective Insurance Company of America as subrogee of Home Delivery Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Retail Delivery
Defendant: The United States Department of the Marines Forces, Keith Ryan Wilson, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rein v. Esper
as 19-842
Defendant / Appellee: Secretary Eric K. Fanning, United States Department of the Army, United States Department of Army, Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper, United States Department of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donna Rein
Human Rights Watch v. U.S. Central Command et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11503
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Air Force, U.S. Central Command, U.S. Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff: Human Rights Watch
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hispanic Federation et al v. United States Department of the Army
as 1:2018cv07969
Plaintiff: Labor Council For Latin American Advancement, Southwest Environmental Center, Hispanic Federation and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05995
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gilchrist v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00853
Defendant: Department of the Army, United States Department of Defense and United States of America
Plaintiff: Loraine Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gilchrist v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv03149
Defendant: Department of the Army, United States Department of Defense and United States of America
Plaintiff: Loraine Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-779
Plaintiff - Appellee: American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights and others
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice, and its Components Civil Rights Division, Criminal Division, Office of Information and Privacy, Office of Intelligence, Policy amd Review, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of State and others
Defendant - Appellant: United States Department of Defense, its Components Department of Army, Department of Navy, Department of Air Force, Defense Intelligence Agency and United States Department of the Army
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant: EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant: Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant: Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?