Cases 21 - 30 of 1,101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Diamond v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv03668
Plaintiff:
Michael Diamond
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Diamond v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Robert Diamond
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Jigar Raythatha, Luis A. Diaz, Jr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Estate of Daniel L. Maher et al v. World Assembly of Muslim Youth et al
as 1:2023cv02845
Defendant:
Adel Batterjee, Armand Albert Freidrich Huber, World Assembly of Muslim Youth and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel L. Maher, Katherine Maher, Daniel R. Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bussey v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Diamond Bussey
Defendant:
Shaun Moore and Joseph Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
