Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Gary Null & Associates, Inc. v. Pacifica Foundation, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Defendant:
Lydia Brazon, Mitchell Cohen, John Gladney Proffitt and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Null & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bleil v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01492
Plaintiff:
Margie Bleil
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Singleton et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv06957
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Singleton
Defendant:
New York Police Department, Chester Chung, Officers John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chassman v. Shipley
as 1:2015cv05228
Plaintiff:
Margie Chassman
Defendant:
Robert Shipley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chassman et al v. Bezzabeh et al
as 1:2015cv04869
Plaintiff:
Samey Gebremengist and Margie Chassman
Defendant:
Mulugeta Bezzabeh, Ethiopian Agricultural and Industrial Amalgamated SCo., China Jiangxi Corporation for International Economic and Technical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. City of New York Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv04135
Plaintiff:
Margie M. Brown
Defendant:
City of New York Police Department, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
Margie Michael
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bloome v. Silver Street Development Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03158
Plaintiff:
Margie Bloome
Defendant:
John Doe and Silver Street Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bloome v. Marshall
as 1:2014cv03159
Plaintiff:
Margie Bloome
Defendant:
Elishabah Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Margie Roberts
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
