Cases 21 - 30 of 33
United States of America v. Gil (Crule)
as 18-1190
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Ruben Gil, AKA Unc, AKA Ruben Gil Campos, AKA Mayor of Mexico, Herman E. Aguirre, AKA 007, AKA Lucky, AKA Primo, AKA Freddy, Sonia Hernandez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rashawn Crule, AKA Black, AKA Shawn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Derivas v. Derivas et al
as 1:2017cv05519
Plaintiff:
Deborah Elaine Derivas
Defendant:
Carlos Alfred Derivas, III, Fred Selman Golson, Eva Wright Golson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Watkins v. United States Armed Force
as 12-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tony Dugal Watkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Armed Forces, Army EUSA Camp, Humphreys, Korea, CSC 138th INF, Korea, John H. Berger, MSG, AFEES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
