Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Black v. Anheuser-Busch in Bev
as 16-4028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randall M. Black
Defendant - Appellee:
Anheuser-Busch in Bev
Defendant:
Tommy Shannon, Ray McLoughlin, Shreyas Balakrishnan and others
Martinez v. AKN Fabrics Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04242
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
AKN Fabrics Inc. and Anand Kumar Nair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Black v. Anheuser-Busch in Bev et al
as 1:2014cv02693
Plaintiff:
Randall M. Black
Defendant:
Anheuser-Busch in Bev , Tommy Shannon, Ray McLoughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Telfair v. Martinez et al
as 2:2013cv05260
Defendant:
Luis Cortez, Dulce Hernandez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald S. Telfair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quiles v. Richardo et al
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quiles
Defendant:
Joel Pichardo, Miguel Martinez, Reagan Okieme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Martinez v. Holder
as 12-4887
Petitioner:
Miguel M. Garcia-Martinez, AKA Miguel Garcia-Martinez, AKA Miguel Martinez Garcia
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Martinez v. Correction Officer Kellog et al
as 1:2011cv09427
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
Correction Officer Kellog, Capt. Brown and Warden of G.R.V.C.: Rose AGRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Ragtime Foods of New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01483
Defendant:
Angelo Gurino and Ragtime Foods of New York, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez-Moises v. Holder
as 11-779
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Martinez-Moises
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Al Baumann v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2010cv03676
Plaintiff:
Wayne Al Baumann
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, New York City Council, Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
