Cases 21 - 28 of 28
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Paxton Painting Corp.
as 1:2016cv08555
Plaintiff:
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Defendant:
Paxton Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Skipp v. GAT et al
as 3:2016cv01619
Petitioner:
Susan Skipp, GAT and WGT
Respondent:
Ken Paxton, Shawn Tittle and Laura Choi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds v. Paxton Painting Corp.
as 7:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds
Defendant:
Paxton Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Hailee Paxton , Penny Ridley , Danna Salvaleon-Cua and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Does and Danielle Thate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canel et al v. Legacy Bank of America Pension Plan et al
as 3:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
Richard Canel , Gordon Elliot , Alan Seymour and others
Defendant:
Legacy Bank of America Pension Plan and Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefits Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Paxton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00587
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. William Connick and John Doe #1-10
Plaintiff:
Troy Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds, v. Paxton Painting Corp.
as 7:2010cv07939
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds,
Defendant:
Paxton Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Paxton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01371
Defendant:
P.O. Michael Cerullo, City of New York and P.O.s John Doe #1-10
Plaintiff:
Troy Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
