Cases 21 - 30 of 1,317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Da La Mora (Huato)
as 23-8014
Defendant / Appellant:
ADALID CABRERA HUATO, China, Arana and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GIOVANNI DE LA MORA, ROGELIO RAMOS ROMAGUERA, TOMMY NEPONUCENO and others
Arana-De Ramos v. Garland
as 23-8007
Petitioner:
ROSA DE LA PAZ ARANA-DE RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos v. 123Tires and Service LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09146
Plaintiff:
Miguel Ramos
Defendant:
123Tires and Service LLC, Aharon Biton and Kijana Noel
Bell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10851
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lacey Bell, Emalynn Bell, Alivia Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Roca et al v. Central Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09115
Plaintiff:
Yini Sanchez Roca, Epifano Reyes Delgado and Lucia Ramos Duran
Defendant:
Central Transport, LLC and Fevrius Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
