Cases 31 - 40 of 498
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rahaman v. Reynolds et al
as 9:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Mizanoor Rahaman
Defendant:
Sgt. Richard Reynolds, Sgt. William Tolman, C.O. Andy Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillermo v. Starting C & M Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05022
Defendant:
Martin Collado, Bernardo Collado, Martine Collado and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Carmen Guillermo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
DeCamp v. Picone et al
as 1:2023cv01844
Plaintiff:
Manuchka DeCamp
Defendant:
Mirka Picone, Martine Longchamp, Andy Jean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vela et al v. AMC Networks, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vela, Nicholas Nunez and Andy Germuga
Defendant:
AMC Networks, Inc. and AMC Networks, Inc. doing business as AMC +
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
Ocasio v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andy Ocasio
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Jane and/or John Doe #1, Jane and/or John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devereaux v. Michael et al
as 1:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
Robert Devereaux and VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings
Defendant:
Gavin Michael, David Clifton, Sean Collins and others
Rolle v. Excell Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Andy Rolle
Defendant:
Excell Communications, Inc. and Abel Barbosa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Second A-One, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Second A-One, Inc., Isack David Weisz, La Jarabacoa Deli and Grocery Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
