Cases 31 - 40 of 44
United States of America v. Branch (Cummings)
as 15-2035
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Branch, AKA Quist, Bernard Miles, Yackeem McFarlane, AKA Captain and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Armani Cummings, AKA Al and Christopher Nwanko, AKA Big Boi
Bynum v. Pacquiao et al
as 1:2015cv03016
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Todd Dubeof, Home Box Office, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chamar Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bynum v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 1:2014cv06855
Plaintiff:
Ivin Bynum
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Magnum Hunter Resources
as 14-2581
Plaintiff:
Mary Pappas, The ILNAF Trust, Mike Gretschel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Paige
Defendant - Appellee:
Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, Gary C. Evans, Ronald D. Ormand and others
Hanft v. Bailes et al
as 1:2013cv03864
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hanft
Defendant:
J. Raleigh Bailes, Brad Bynum, Victor G. Carrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Holder et al v. Alamo Financing LP et al
as 1:2012cv05118
Defendant:
Alamo Financing LP and Zaineb Mohammed
Plaintiff:
Ellen Bynum and Aaliyah Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bynum v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv05111
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Irma Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McGill et al v. DeMarco
as 2:2011cv04946
Plaintiff:
James McGill, Ricardo Limage, Bryant Sheppard and others
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bynum v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06228
Plaintiff:
Elexuses Bynum
Defendant:
City of New York , Martin F. Horn , Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
