Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Kruppenbacher v. Annucci et al
as 9:2016cv01436
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kruppenbacher
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Karen Bellamy, Steven Racette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Sposato et al
as 1:2016cv06333
Plaintiff:
Derick Hernandez
Defendant:
John Doe 1-7, Nassau Medical Staff and Sheriff Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07985
Plaintiff:
Leticia Melo
Defendant:
City of New York , Garfield Mead and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Martinez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07343
Plaintiff:
Matthew Martinez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jason Miller and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fouche v. Patterson et al
as 1:2016cv03875
Plaintiff:
Steve Fouche
Defendant:
Reginald Patterson, Epifanio Vasquez, John Does 1-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Daniels v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv02992
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John/Jane Doe GMDC Warden, John/Jane Doe GMDC Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward v. New York State et al
as 1:2015cv05316
Defendant:
Dr. Agarin, Doe 1-9, Jeanne Morrison and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Ward, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClellan v.City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv06759
Plaintiff:
Hakeem McClellan
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Suraju Murtala and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. The City Bivens Claim et al
as 1:2015mc01625
Defendant:
Clerk of the Appellate Division failure to issue writ, Court Reporter, John Doe 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gibson
Palermo v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv06370
Defendant:
Matthew Gale, John and Jane Doe, 1-7 and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Hector Palermo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
