Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
In Re: XP Inc. Securities Liti
as 21-903
Defendant:
Gabriel Klas da Rocha Leal, Guilherme Santana Monteiro da Silva, Julio Capua Ramos da Silva and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Itau BBA USA Securities, Inc., Jared Wilson, XP Investments US, LLC and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Swayam Prakash and Usha Prakash
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arceno and Joseph Acerno
Plaintiff / Appellant:
4F's Family, Inc. and 4Fs Family, Inc.
SL-X Trading Europe Limited v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
In re: Farfetch Limited Securi
as 21-2752
Plaintiff:
Jeff Omdahl and Jeff Omdahl, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAM National Pension Fund and Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant / Appellee:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Golden Horn Asset and Management LTD. v. D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi et al
as 1:2021cv08634
Plaintiff:
GOLDEN HORN ASSET AND MANAGEMENT LTD and Golden Horn Asset and Management LTD.
Defendant:
D-MARKET ELEKTRONIK HIZMETLER VE TICARET ANONIM IRKETI a/k/a DMARKET ELECTRONIC SERVICES & TRADING d/b/a/ HEPSIBURADA, MEHMET MURAT EMIRDA, HALIL KORHAN Z and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Mustafin v. GreenSky, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11071
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC, Guggenheim Securities, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rustam Mustafin
Petitioner:
The Fund Group, Inter-Local Pension Fund of the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Mitchell DeVivo and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Bradley Yu
Not Classified By Court:
TimesSquare Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Edmar Financial Company, LLC et al v. Currenex, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06598
Plaintiff:
Edmar Financial Company, LLC and Irish Blue & Gold, Inc.,
Defendant:
Currenex, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, HC Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Array Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04390
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Jim Fusaro, ATI Investment Parent, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Plymouth County Retirement Association
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Julian Keippel
Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 21-663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant:
Henry Bath & Son Limited, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., Glencore Ltd. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
