Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Hines v. Rell et al
as 3:2013cv01516
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Hines
Defendant:
Jodi Rell, Dan Malloy, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverman v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2012cv00787
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jodi Silverman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiefer v. Moran Foods, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Kiefer, Brian Andrikis, Edward Roach and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
David Pagano
Defendant:
Moran Foods, Inc. doing business as Save A Lot Ltd. and Moran Foods, LLC doing business as Save A Lot Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Richardson v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2011cv01955
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Jodi M. Rell, Child Support Div. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Chien v. Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Co., et al
as 3:2011cv01387
Defendant:
Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Co , Scott Cramer , Steve Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jennings v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01287
Plaintiff:
Jodie Jennings
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Rell et al
as 3:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Theoppolis Sims
Defendant:
Jodi Rell, Leo Arnone, Somer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Rell et al
as 3:2010cv01284
Plaintiff:
Theoppolis Sims
Defendant:
Jodi Rell and Leo Arnone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isagba v. Stamford, Ct., City Of et al
as 3:2010cv01145
Plaintiff:
Jodie-Ann Isagba
Defendant:
Stamford, Ct., City Of, Stamford Police Dept, Paul Mabey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
