Cases 31 - 40 of 2,899
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04689
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hobson v. Department of Correction and Community Supervision (D.O.C.C.S.) et al
as 1:2024cv05029
Defendant:
Dr. Stillman, C. Gleason, Dr. Akhter and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
De Dunker v. McNeil et al
as 1:2024cv04640
Defendant:
Miller Dedicated Services, LLC, Miller Auto Leasing, Co. and Geoffrey T. McNeil
Plaintiff:
Anajay Romero Ubiera De Dunker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Miller v. Racism et al
as 6:2024cv06378
Defendant:
Racism, White Supremacy, Government Funding Building and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Racism Bilingual Men et al
as 6:2024cv06380
Defendant:
Racism Foreigners, Racism Bilingual Men, Clients and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. McKoy et al
as 6:2024cv06381
Defendant:
Tim Hinks, Lovely Ann Warren, Sheree McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
