Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gorokhovskaya v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv01547
Plaintiff:
Mira Gorokhovskaya
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Malak v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01523
Plaintiff:
Naser Abdel Malak
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gong v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01471
Plaintiff:
Xue Gong
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Ethan Enzer and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Aguiar v. Keisler et al
as 3:2007cv01453
Plaintiff:
Jackeline Mathias Aguiar
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff and Emilio Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Zhune-Torres v. Keisler et al
as 3:2007cv01452
Plaintiff:
Erickson Zhune-Torres
Defendant:
Peter Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Howard v. Enzer et al
as 3:2007cv01412
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Ethan Enzer, Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Nafees v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01332
Petitioner:
Sarosh Nafees
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzalez, Denis Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cahua v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv01312
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cahua
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
