Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Archer v. The Evelyn Douglin Center For Serving People in Need et al
as 1:2019cv01641
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Archer
Defendant:
The Evelyn Douglin Center For Serving People in Need, The New York Foundling Hospital and The Evelyn Douglin Center For Serving People in Need doing business as The Thrive Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Crowhurst v. Szczucki
as 19-519
Defendant / Appellee:
The Fannie Rebecca Dicker Stein Special Needs Trust, Sheryl Dicker Stein, as Administrator of the Estate of Norman Stein, Dr. Denise Szczucki and others
Defendant:
Hampton Inns Management LLC, Dr. Seth Leven, Norman Stein and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Crowhurst
Lopez v. Foot Locker Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01271
Defendant:
Sneak EZ, LLC, Grand Cutters Barber Shop, Inc., Akamai Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Need It Now Delivers, LLC v. EFM USA LLC
as 1:2018cv12011
Plaintiff:
NEED IT NOW DELIVERS, LLC
Defendant:
EFM USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv07757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
Islam v. Athlete's Needs, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01562
Plaintiff:
Mir Islam
Defendant:
Athlete's Needs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
