Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Newsome et al v. New York City Board of Elections
as 1:2013cv05787
Plaintiff:
Walter Newsome, Krystal Tolbert and Kenny Krump
Defendant:
New York City Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newsome v. Correction
as 12-5049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Newsome
Respondent - Appellee:
Department of Corrections, Comm
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baum et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Larry Baum, Eunice Boutte, Charmaine Fontenot and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dattilo et al v. Newsome
as 1:2011cv03484
Plaintiff:
Desiree Dattilo and John Dattilo
Defendant:
Zachery Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edwards v. N.Y.S. Workers Compensation Bo
as 10-4605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sharmaine O. Edwards, and Beneficiaries
Defendant - Appellee:
N.Y.S. Workers Compensation Board, Commissioner Karl A. Henry, Commissioner A. Edel Groski and others
Edwards v. N.Y.S. Workers Compensation Board et al
as 1:2010cv03862
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine O. Edwards
Defendant:
N.Y.S. Workers Compensation Board, Karl A. Henry, A. Edel Groski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome et al v. Oliveri
as 1:2009cv10196
Plaintiff:
Joann Newsome
Defendant:
Jack Artale and Vincent Oliveri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Newsome v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv04179
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Newsome
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
