Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Nam v. Moschino USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv09462
Defendant:
Moschino USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nam
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nam v. Marc Jacobs International, L.L.C.
as 1:2019cv09463
Defendant:
Marc Jacobs International, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nam
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chevron Corporation v. Donziger
as 19-1584
Defendant:
Omayihue Baihua, Daniel Carlos Lusitand Yaiguaje, Maria Magdalena Rodri Barcenes and others
Respondent:
Andrew Woods, Laura J. Garr and H5
Not Yet Classified:
Donziger & Associates, PLLC, Steven R. Donziger, The Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger and others
Nam v. Royal Air Maroc, Ltd.
as 1:2019cv05104
Defendant:
Royal Air Maroc, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Djiby Nam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airigan Solutions, LLC v. Yiwu Lanhome Jewelry Co., Ltd
as 19-1003
Defendant:
MIAONV Store, AmyHome Store Store, Rinat/UniGalaxy and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Luckly Yune Store, Your assistant Store, Aladingding Store and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Airigan Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
ABC
Nam et al v. Ichiba Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01222
Defendant:
David Ahn, Ichiba Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Chong Chol Nam and Myun Jae Ko
Elohim EPF USA, Inc. v. 162 D & Y Corp. et al.
as 1:2019cv02431
Defendant:
PHIL SOOK CHO, Hye Kyung Han, SS NOBLESSE HOUSE, INC. d/b/a NOBLESSE HOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
ELOHIM EPF USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A & J Produce Corp. v. Abraham Produce Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv10602
Defendant:
Nam H. Lee and Abraham Produce Corp.
Plaintiff:
A & J Produce Corp.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
