Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Carlson v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, W. Steve Albrecht, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carlson
Shepherd v. Keyser et al
as 1:2021cv02363
Defendant:
Deputy Superintenden J. Krom, FHSD Wollf, Osi S. Keyser and others
Plaintiff:
Eon Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Shepherd v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Shepherd
Defendant:
Bungie, Inc., Google LLC and id Software LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shepherd v. Kings County District Attorney Gonzales et al
as 1:2020cv02675
Defendant:
Esq. Michael Butchen, Kings County District Attorney Gonzales, ADA Desmond Green and others
Plaintiff:
Eon Shephard and Eon Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Royce
as 1:2020cv00602
Petitioner:
Eon Shepherd
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AKF, Inc. v. Authority National Supply Company, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv06542
Defendant:
Daniel G Martin, Innovest Global, Inc., TN3, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AKF,Inc. d/b/a Fundkite and AKF, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bergrin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv09681
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Dan Polster, Jane Branstetter Stranch and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Bergrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gromova et al v. Gee-Shepherd
as 1:2019cv05356
In Re:
In the Matter of E.G.S.
Petitioner:
Kristina Gromova
Respondent:
Brian Gee-Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
