Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Edwards v. New Haven et al
as 3:2015cv00144
Plaintiff: Charles Edwards
Defendant: City of New Haven, Department of Human Rights and Human Services, House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Human Rights and Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00093
Plaintiff: Charles Edwards and Derrick Edward
Defendant: Department of Human Rights and Human Services, Fikrig, Yale Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives and Brian Sutter
as 1:2014mc00193
Defendant: The Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives and Brian Sutter
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Hurt v. N.R.A. et al and its affiliates et al
as 1:2014cv03738
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant: United States House of Representatives, United States Senate and N.R.A. et al and its affiliates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fowlkes v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv04301
Plaintiff: Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant: Barack Obama, John F. Barry, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Managemen
as 12-3872
Plaintiff - Appellee: Joanne Pedersen, Ann Meitzen, Gerald V. Passaro, II and others
Defendant - Appellant: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, Office of Personnel Management, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury and others
Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management
as 12-3273
Plaintiff - Appellee: Joanne Pedersen, Ann Meitzen, Gerald V. Passaro, II and others
Defendant: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant - Appellant: Office of Personnel Management, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury, Michael J. Astrue, in his office capacity as the Commissioner of the Social Security and others
Windsor v. United States of America Featured Case
as 12-2435
Plaintiff - Appellee: Edith Schlain Windsor, In her Official capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer
Defendant - Appellant: United States of America and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives
Windsor v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2335
Plaintiff - Appellee: Edith Schlain Windsor, In her Official capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer
Defendant: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives
Capurso v. Bank & Banking
as 12-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant: Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant: Wall Street, New York, The U.S. Stock Market & Land Use, Areas, & unauthorized, Land use, areas & disclosures, re: district, newspaper, 10/14/2011, 8/5/2011, &wall street journal the wall street journal & the new york almanac, the almanac of record, wall , Carleon Corporate Mercers or Acquisitions in United States, Post 1950, Since 1995 to current see the World Almanac and Book of Facts Year 2003, Pg 121, Eastern, States, Bank &Banking, Credit Card Association, Credit Cards, Rare, Laws, Regulations & Rules, in current & recent, , for past 1900 of, for 2000 of, since past 1900 of, since 1900 of, all named of and others
Defendant - Appellee: Washington Munial, Seattle, Washington, doing business in State of New York & in State of California in a being aquired by JP Morgan Chase Bank, since 2001, Congress of the United States, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., doing business in States, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, & Utah, & Elsewhere, credit card purchases, interest rate, & minimum, payment, increase as of 11/20/2011 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?