Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Capital One, National Associat v. 48-52 Franklin, LLC
as 14-1573
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Capital One, National Association
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: Marshall Weisman and 48-52 Franklin, LLC
Defendant: The New York City Bureau of Highway Operations, Creative Habitats, Inc. and CM & Associates Construction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1153
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff: Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent: Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Not Yet Classified: Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
3Rd Party Defendant: The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant: Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Defendant: Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Appellee: Paul Flecker, Torgan & Cooper, P.C., Daniel Ennis and others
Defendant / Appellant: Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant: Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Saul Bienenfeld v. Carlos Calderon
as 12-687
Plaintiff: Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent: Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Not Yet Classified: Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
3Rd Party Defendant: The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant: Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kelly Garigliano, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Mauldin and others
Defendant: Richard Godosky, Attorney, Jose Paguay and John Scott Thompson
Not Classified By Court: Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Defendant / Appellant: Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant: Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Appellee: Aisha Williams, Paul Esposito, Osserritta Robinson, Administratrix of the Estate of Louis Alexander Robinson and Osserritta Robinson and others
Blue Zenith, LLC v. Rohde
as 1:2013cv01093
Plaintiff: Blue Zenith, LLC
Defendant: Patrick Rohde
Counter_claimant: Patrick Rohde
Cross_defendant: Campus Labs LLC
Counter_defendant: Eric Reich , Michael Weisman and John Does I-VIII
Movant: Higher One, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Spigelman v. Weisman
as 3:2013cv01430
Plaintiff: Chaya Spigelman
Defendant: Sylvia Weisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weissman v. Weisman
as 1:2013cv06623
Plaintiff: Chaya Weissman
Defendant: Sylvia Weisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weisman v. BNP Parabus et al
as 2:2013cv04381
Defendant: BNP Parabus and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff: Kenneth Weisman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02864
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?