Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Shakur v. Fontaine et al
as 3:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Mecca Allah Shakur
Defendant:
David Fontaine, Fisher, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antil v. Fisher Asset Mgmt LLC
as 3:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jane Antil
Defendant:
Fisher Asset Mgmt LLC and Fisher Investments Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Artis v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Troy Artis
Defendant:
Peter Murphy, Gery Wright, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calixto v. Lantz et al
as 3:2009cv02123
Plaintiff:
Edward Calixto
Defendant:
Theresa C. Lantz, Peter Murphy, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Lantz et al
as 3:2009cv02047
Petitioner:
Tracy Fisher
Respondent:
Theresa C. Lantz and J. Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fisher v. Mitsubishi Elec Corp et al
as 3:2009cv01899
Plaintiff:
Todd Fisher
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Elec Corp and Mitsubishi Digital Elec Amer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher et al v. Bayer Corp et al
as 3:2009cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Fisher, Robert Hintz, Sharon King and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bigelow v. Danbury et al
as 3:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
Damon F. Bigelow
Defendant:
City of Danbury, James Fisher, Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
