Cases 41 - 50 of 3,569
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Pondi v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Pondi
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rachlin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Plaintiff:
Dana Rachlin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WB and B Executive Search v. City of New York
as 24-845
Plaintiff:
WB AND B EXECUTIVE SEARCH
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRAD LANDER, in his capacity as Comptroller of the City of New York, OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK CITY COMPTROLLER and others
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02535
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
Mayor Adams, NYC Dept. of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Shawn Randall Thomas
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Leroy Adams, Keechant Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neil v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul O'Neil
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd Headley and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Anatomy IT, LLC v. CyberLife Systems, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Anatomy IT, LLC
Defendant:
CyberLife Systems, Inc., Eric Johnson and Adam Piazza
Cardwood v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Armani Cardwood
Defendant:
The City of New York, Adam A Arce and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
