Cases 41 - 50 of 185
Rosario v. Hassett et al
as 1:2020cv01818
Defendant:
R. Krajewski, M. Balon, T. G. Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Hickliff Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01087
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Barber v. Somal Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Jatinder S. Somal and Somal Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eden V. Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv02939
Defendant:
Miguel Lopez, Miguel Barber Shop Corp., Miguel Lopez doing business as Miguel's Barbershop and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Briglin v. Morley et al
as 9:2020cv00614
Defendant:
RN Jane Doe, Corrections Officer "John Doe #2", New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Briglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donoghue et al v. H&E Equipment Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03778
Defendant:
Bradley W. Barber
Plaintiff:
Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein
Nominal Defendant:
H&E Equipment Services, Inc.
Barber v. Howard
as 1:2020cv00461
Petitioner:
Kevin Curtis Barber
Respondent:
Sheriff Timothy Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. LaClair et al
as 9:2020cv00441
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hill and Derrick Troy Hill
Defendant:
Franklin Correctional Facility, V. Barber, F. Quimby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06144
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tracy Anthony Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
