Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Medeiros v. USA
as 1:2014cv00885
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Helder Rui Cabral De Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morston v. Cabral et al
as 1:2014cv05079
Defendant:
P.O. Ramon E. Cabral, P.O. John Doe 1 and P.O. John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Barry Morston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabral v. Jason & Joseph Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06912
Plaintiff:
Viviana Cabral
Defendant:
Jason & Joseph Corp. and Hong Ki Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AMH 21, LLC v. Expedito Cabral et al
as 1:2014cv04290
Plaintiff:
AMH 21, LLC
Defendant:
Expedito Cabral, John Doe 1 through 12, New York City Environmental Control Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Cabral v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv03715
Plaintiff:
Marie Cabral
Defendant:
AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phaneuf et al v. General Motors L.L.C.
as 1:2014cv03298
Plaintiff:
Lisa Phaneuf , Adam Smith , Mike Garcia and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent et al v. Westport et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mark Sargent , John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Town of Westport , Ryan Paulsson , Thomas Casimoro, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrester v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06324
Defendant:
Police Officer Trina Andrea, Sergeant Donald Boyle, Police Officer Ramon Cabral and others
Plaintiff:
James Forrester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cabral v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
Cindy Cabral
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Noble et al v. Tshirtsiwant.com et al
as 1:2013cv05086
Plaintiff:
Richard Noble
Defendant:
Crazetees.com, Tshirtsiwant.com, Swag-City.com and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
