Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Abreu v. Lira
as 17-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee: Michael J. Lira, Deputy Commissioner for Programs at Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, Gerald J. Otis, Deputy Commissioner for Administrative; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities, David A. Rock, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Defendant: Cromp, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Constantino, Correctional Captain; Wende Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, S. Danforth, Facility Steward; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Abreu v. Lipka
as 17-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee: Kimberly Lipka, Medical Nurse; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Paolano, Physician Great Meadow Correctional Facility, D. Karandy, Dr.; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Lira
as 17-1848
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee: Michael J. Lira, Deputy Commissioner for Programs at Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, Gerald J. Otis, Deputy Commissioner for Administrative; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities, David A. Rock, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Defendant: Cromp, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Constantino, Correctional Captain; Wende Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacities, S. Danforth, Facility Steward; Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in both individual and official capacities and others
Abreu v. Lipka
as 17-777
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee: Kimberly Lipka, Medical Nurse; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Doctor Paolano, Physician Great Meadow Correctional Facility, D. Karandy, Dr.; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Crichlow v. Fischer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00194
Plaintiff: Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant: John Doe, Daniel Baver, Chief Medical Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucano v. Koenigsmann
as 16-4141
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Rucano
Defendant - Appellee: Michael Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Vonda Johnson, Facility Health Services Director, Clinton Correctional Facility, Excelsa Serabian, Facility Dentist, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner and Chief Medical Officer, NYS DOCCS, Mary D'Silva, Director of Correctional Dental Services, NYS DOCCS, Jane Doe, PREA Supervisor, NYS DOCCS and others
Thon v. Grimshaw
as 16-3628
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frank Thon
Defendant - Appellee: C. Grimshaw, Sergeant at Clinton Correctional Facility, Tod Poupore, Correctional Officer at Clinton Correctional Facility, Betsy Whelden, Correctional Officer at Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: Nurse Khan, Nurse at Clinton Correctional Facility and John Doe
Ross v. Koenigsmann
as 16-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alonzo Ross
Defendant - Appellee: Subbarao Ramineni, Ventaka Mannava, Amy Ferguson, Nurse Practitioner and others
Harrison v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv04141
Plaintiff: Johnnie Harrison
Defendant: City of New York, Manava, Reminini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crichlow v. Fischer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv06252
Plaintiff: Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant: Brian Fischer , Ellen Youssef , .John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?