Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Edmondson et al v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02242
Plaintiff:
Jaime Edmondson , Cielo Jean Gibson , Jessica Burciaga and others
Defendant:
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. , Peregrine Enterprises, Inc. , RCI Dining Services (37th Street), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lancaster v. Martuscello
as 9:2016cv00166
Petitioner:
William Lancaster
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Mirsky et al
as 2:2015cv07138
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lancaster
Defendant:
Vicky Miller and Mark Mirsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Walker et al
as 1:2015cv08876
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Noel Walker, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., Lancaster Mortgage Bankers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marki v. Town of Lancaster et al
as 1:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Marki
Defendant:
Town of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanyo v. The Town of Lancaster et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ann Vanyo
Defendant:
The Town of Lancaster, Erin Myers, Jessica Sparfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
Staci Lancaster and Korey Lancaster
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
