Cases 41 - 50 of 3,677
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Pirrello et al
as 2:2023cv08953
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Raymond Pirrello, Marcello Follano, Robert Cassino and others
Intervenor:
United States Attorney Eastern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hudson v. One Call Concepts Locating Services, Inc.
as 2:2023cv09170
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hudson
Defendant:
One Call Concepts Locating Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Nardo v. East River Medical Imaging, P.C.
as 2:2023cv08952
Plaintiff:
Raymond Nardo
Defendant:
East River Medical Imaging, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bull v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bull
Defendant:
Thomas J. Murphy, Penko K. Ivanov, Edward J. Campanella and others
United States of America v. White
as 24-66
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND WHITE, Sealed Defendant 1, John Raymond Anthony White and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Macaluso v. Tantillo Auto Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09519
Plaintiff:
Peter Macaluso
Defendant:
Tantillo Auto Group, LLC, Raymond Tantillo, Thomas Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Scott v. The United States
as 6:2023cv06633
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
