Cases 41 - 50 of 374
Pryce v. Progressive Corporation
as 22-813
Petitioner:
Progressive Corporation, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Respondent:
Cecelia Pryce, suing individually on her own behalf and representatively on behalf of a class of plaintiffs similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Talarico v. The Port Authority of New York
as 22-593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charlene Talarico, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Plutzer v. Bankers Trust Company of South
as 22-561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Plutzer, on behalf of the Tharanco Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Bankers Trust Company of South Dakota, a South Dakota Limited Liability Corporation, Haresh T. Tharani, Michael J. Setola and others
Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 22-404
Petitioner:
The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee, John Does 1-20 and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Respondent:
Leonid Falberg, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Frank Martz Coach Company et al
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
Frank Martz Coach Company, Gold Line, Inc., Gold Line Inc. of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor:
James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 22-98
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Levon Aleksanian, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives, Sonam Lama, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives and Harjit Khatra, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives
Defendant / Appellee:
Uber Technologies Inc., Jointly and severally, Uber Logistik, LLC, jointly and severally and Uber USA LLC
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
