Cases 41 - 50 of 941
Tom Hussey Photography, LLC v. Generations Home Care, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Tom Hussey Photography, LLC
Defendant:
Generations Home Care Inc. doing business as Generations Home Care Inc. and Generations Home Care, Inc. doing business as Generations Home Care
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
von der Schmidt et al v. Higgins et al
as 1:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
Edward M. von der Schmidt, Keanna Ngo and Eddie von der Schmidt
Defendant:
Tom Higgins, Flavio Colella, Silverstein Properties, D/B/A River Place Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Azzarello v. Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation et al
as 1:2023cv03197
Defendant:
Antanas Guoga, Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Bullfrog Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Crosby Azzarello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 et al v. Bison Painting & Decorating Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4, Michael Hogan, Daniel LaFrance and others
Defendant:
Bison Painting & Decorating Corp. and Paul Scouras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jane Doe v. Related Companies, LLP et al
as 1:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Related Companies, LLP, Stephen M. Ross, Bruce Beal, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tedder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02812
Plaintiff:
William Tedder, Maureen Cobb, Richard Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Mimassi v. The Village of New York Mills et al
as 6:2023cv00338
Defendant:
Kathryn Hartnett, The Village of New York Mills, The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of New York Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mimassi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
as 23-304
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased, Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased, and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond Anthony Smith, as Administrator of the Estate of George Eric Smith, deceased.
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, The Taliban, Al Qaida/Islamic Army and others
Defendant:
Saddam Hussein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
