Cases 51 - 60 of 320
Houston v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06377
Defendant:
City City of Rochester, Fastrac Markets LLC, City of Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
mahogany houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Houston Wire & Cable Company et al
as 1:2021cv04127
Defendant:
Sandford W. Rote, William H. Sheffield, Roy W. Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Davenport
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Friedman v. Houston Wire & Cable Company et al
as 1:2021cv02405
Defendant:
William H. Sheffield, Roy W. Haley, Sandford W. Rothe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Friedman
Houston Casualty Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
as 1:2021cv03501
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston Casualty Company v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv03182
Defendant:
Hudson Excess Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd
Houston Casualty Company v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv03144
Defendant:
Hudson Excess Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd
Houston Casualty Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 1:2021cv01909
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
United States of America v. Houston (McCullough)
as 21-842
Defendant:
James A. Houston
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Troy L. McCullough
United States of America v. Forbes
as 21-615
Defendant:
Christopher Gay, Jeffrey Houston, Kasam Hennix and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Timothy Forbes
Houston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01843
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Houston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
