Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Ochoa-Garcia v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Sonia Ochoa-Garcia
Defendant:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Ceparano et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Defendant:
Bruce Ceparano, Eduardo Ochoa and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ochoa v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
as 2:2014cv06250
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Plaintiff:
Maria Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Ochoa-Benitez v. Holder
as 14-3285
Petitioner:
Saul Ruben Ochoa-Benitez, AKA Saul Ochoa, AKA Saul R. Ochoa
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Contreras et al v. Windy Farm Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv03564
Plaintiff:
Neftali Contreras , Jorge Ochoa , Jose Herrera and others
Defendant:
Windy Farm Inc., Michael Grenadier and Mark Sousa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ochoa v. City of New York
as 1:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Maria Alonso Ochoa
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ochoa v. Pallets Unlimited, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ivan Ochoa
Defendant:
Pallets Unlimited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ochoa v. Cafe on Crescent Street Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07287
Defendant:
Cafe on Crescent Street Inc. and Demetrio Zacatelco
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ochoa v. Roys Pizza Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07290
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ochoa
Defendant:
Roys Pizza Inc. and Roy Savelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roberts v. Bexar County Sherriff's Department et al
as 3:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Roberts
Defendant:
Bexar County Sherriff's Department, Jesus Ochoa, Ray Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
