Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Wolfe v. Bergman
as 3:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Cedric L. Wolfe
Defendant:
Benjamin Bergman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergman et al v. Kular
as 1:2010cv01631
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bergman and Adam Mackillop
Defendant:
Andrew Kular
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 9:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 6:2009cv06431
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Supervised Lifestyles, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv09551
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Supervised Lifestyles, Inc., SLS Residential, Inc., SLS Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Green v. American Society of Composers Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) et al
as 1:2008cv05789
Plaintiff:
William James Green
Defendant:
American Society of Composers Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), Marilyn Bergman, Alan Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: 19 Firearms
as 2:2008mc00029
Movant:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ronald L. Stewart, Denise L. Bergman and Walter Stewart
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wolfe v. Bergman et al
as 9:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wolfe
Defendant:
Benjamin Bergman and David E. Harder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
