Cases 71 - 80 of 675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Lane v. Thomas et al
as 6:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Kailyn M. Lane
Defendant:
Scott Thomas and Bruce Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 22-1909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vuzix Corporation
as 6:2022cv06368
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vuzix Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Watchnet, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Watchnet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In re Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. Securities Litigation
as 1:2020cv08585
Defendant:
Ulf Quellmann, Jean- Sbastien Jacques, Luke Colton and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lion
Lead Plaintiff:
Pentwater Funds
Petitioner:
Altannavch Sukhbaatar, Paul Ciaglo, John J. Murphy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vuzix Corporation
as 1:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vuzix Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Moog Inc.
as 1:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Moog Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
