Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Meek-Horton v. Trover Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06054
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Meek-Horton
Defendant:
Trover Solutions Inc. , The Rawlings Company, L.L.C. , First Recovery Group, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00508
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hoyte v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv01548
Petitioner:
Rawle Hoyte
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bunion et al v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01881
Plaintiff:
Larry Bunion , Joel Guerrero , Abraham Diallo and others
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dover v. Holder
as 10-5099
Petitioner:
Rawle Charles Dover
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Hoyte v. Holder
as 10-4911
Petitioner:
Rawle Montgomery Hoyte, AKA Rawte M. Hoyte
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Curto v. Smith
as 10-4386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patricia Curto
Consolidated-Defendant:
Richard P. Mills, Commissioner of New York State Education Department, Nelson Roth, University Counsel, Dave Frank, Teaching Laboratory Manager and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald W. Smith, Dean, Katherine Edmundson, Doctor, Assistant Dean, Hunter Rawlings, III, Doctor, President and others
Dover v. Holder
as 10-3253
Petitioner:
Rawle Charles Dover
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Glover (Hoggard)
as 10-2554
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Genero Marte, G, Robert Rawls, Charles Bunch, AKA June and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Roshaun Hoggard, AKA Foot and Mauriel Glover, AKA Feet
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
