Cases 71 - 80 of 4,036
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent:
MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Dimitri v. Superintendent et al
as 9:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Robert Dimitri
Defendant:
Superintendent, Eric Velie, Lieutenant Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 24-446
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
Corrections Officer WALRATH, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as John Does 4 and 6, Sergeant FLETCHER, Upstate Correctional Facility, TROMBLY, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as Trombley and others
Fagan v. Superintendent
as 24-432
Petitioner:
KEITH FAGAN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, Eastern NY Correctional Facility
Anonymous v. Miller
as 1:2024cv01360
Petitioner:
Anonymous
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Miller and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-415
Plaintiff:
OLGA DAVILA
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MEISHA PORTER, School Chancellor, CHARLES PEEPLES, HR Director and others
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Booker v. Noeth
as 24-407
Petitioner:
AMIN BOOKER
Respondent:
JOSEPH H. NOETH, Superintendent of Attica Facility
White-Span v. Corey
as 24-350
Plaintiff:
JOVELL WHITE-SPAN
Respondent:
JOSEPH E. COREY, SUPERINTENDENT
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 7:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Deputy Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
