Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Bank of America v. Intermark Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv04389
Plaintiff:
Bank of America
Defendant:
Intermark Communications, Inc., John Doe 1 through John Doe 12 and Timothy T. McCallan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bank of America v. Kamico, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05255
Plaintiff:
Bank of America
Defendant:
Kamico, Inc., Kamran Hekmati and John Doe # 1 through John Doe # 12
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, National Association v. Micro Publishing, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05197
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, National Association
Defendant:
Micro Publishing, Inc., Brian Boyajian and "John Doe 1" through "John Doe #12
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Rabito et al
as 1:2011cv02501
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through John Doe 12, New York City Parking Violations Bureau and Francis Rabito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Messam v. N.Y. City Health & Hospital Co
as 11-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Messam
Defendant:
Bellevue Hospital Center and New York City Department of Correction
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Health & Hospital Corp., Cheryl Leak, (Clerical Assistant), Jeremy H. Colley and others
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Bright et al
as 1:2011cv01721
Defendant:
Brenda Bright, John Doe 1 through John Doe 12 and Sperry Associates Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Bryant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Anita Bryant
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. John Doe 1 through P.O. John Doe 12, Supervisory Officer Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Jennie Brown, Benigna Carides and others
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv05611
Defendant:
Aleksander Afanasyev, Amega Inc., Betty Andresol and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Indentity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Viss Supply, Inc:
John Doe 1
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of West Coast, Inc:
John Doe 10
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Chesteron, Inc:
John Doe 11
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Tita Co:
John Doe 12
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Bilt-Rite Orthopedics & Safety, Inc:
John Doe 13
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Wellcore Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 14
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Galasa, Inc:
John Doe 15
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Eco Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 2
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Mikos Trading, Inc:
John Doe 3
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of MDSS Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 4
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Excell Plus, Inc:
John Doe 5
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Riviera Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 6
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Optom Inc:
John Doe 7
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Delazoom, Inc:
John Doe 8
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of New Step Services, Inc:
John Doe 9
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of John Doe Corporations 1-10:
John Does 16-25
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Ferro et al
as 2:2010cv04932
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Leonard Ferro, Leonard J. Ferro, John Doe 1 through John Doe 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
