Cases 81 - 90 of 1,530
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Azcona v. NJDOC Staff Male Female et al
as 1:2023cv08369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arcona and Daniel Azcona
Defendant:
NJDOC Staff Male Female, Conspiracy of Attempt Murder, Stalking Kidnapping Fake FBI Badges, Middlesex County Rescource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tuttle et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tuttle and Kimberly Tuttle
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Kenneson v. Vaccarelli
as 23-1263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kimberly Kenneson and Conrad Membrino
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew P Vaccarelli, James O'Sullivan, Shaelyn Barone and others
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lynam et al
as 2:2023cv06751
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Maureen Lynam and Kimberly Licata
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
