Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Best (Thomas)
as 24-1453
Defendant:
JEFFREY THOMAS, WALLACE BEST, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Trico Tarek Factory v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03731
Plaintiff:
Trico Tarek Factory
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Best
as 24-1411
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander v. Groder et al
as 1:2024cv03858
Plaintiff:
Holmes Alexander
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gil-Bolivar v. Evans & Paul LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Giovanny Gil-Bolivar
Defendant:
Evans & Paul LLC, E&P Holdings 1, LLC and Jeffery Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Doyle et al v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Doyle and Toliver
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Master for Clothes Manufacturing and Embroidery v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Master for Clothes Manufacturing and Embroidery
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
