Cases 1 - 10 of 1,823
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00065
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Rodio and Leonardo Rodio
Defendant:
Daniel P. Raposo and RPM Homes, LLC
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Rodio and Leonardo Rodio
Defendant:
Daniel P. Raposo and RPM Homes, LLC
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pero et al v. Huffer et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Pero and Joseph Mincewicz
Defendant:
Christy Huffer, Dianna Ball, Benak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Empire Merchants LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. and P. M.
Defendant:
Empire Merchants LLC and Empire Merchants Health and Welfare Benefits for Non Bargaining Unit Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Howarth v. J&M Stone & Garden LLC
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
J&M Stone & Garden LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
