Cases 1 - 10 of 7,266
De Dunker v. McNeil et al
as 1:2024cv04640
Plaintiff:
Anajay Romero Ubiera De Dunker
Defendant:
Geoffrey T. McNeil, Miller Auto Leasing, Co. and Miller Dedicated Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hernandez v. Dutches County et al
as 1:2024cv04500
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Hernandez
Defendant:
Dutches County, City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, Detectives Steven Cowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wang v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04198
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and North Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
NDF1, LLC v. Baratta et al
as 7:2024cv04009
Plaintiff:
NDF1, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Baratta, Donna Baratta, M&T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 fc Foreclosure
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
