Cases 1 - 10 of 5,280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daleb v. Town of Manchester et al
as 3:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Abigail Daleb
Defendant:
Town of Manchester, Ryan Bycholski, Michael Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.M. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 2:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
A. M.
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Alejandro Mayorkas, Bethpage Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JUNIOR v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv04464
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JUNIOR
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Junior v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 2:2024cv04464
Plaintiff:
Matthew Junior
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Pinkney v. Bryant et al
as 1:2024cv04753
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinkney
Defendant:
Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky, Randall Steward and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Win v. Perficient, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04701
Plaintiff:
Michael Win
Defendant:
Perficient, Inc., Jeffrey S. Davis, Romil Bahl and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
