Cases 1 - 10 of 1,157
Delacruz v. Ricci et al
as 9:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Delacruz
Defendant:
C.O. Brendan Ricci, C.O. Todd Shoemaker, C.O. Dustin Vanhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Kurian
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
JESSWILL PEREZ
Defendant:
C.O. EBBI KURIAN and C.O. JOHN LACAGNINA
Ross v. Reinhardt et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Ross
Defendant:
J. M. Reinhardt, T. V. Hilton, D. J. Pangallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Pearson v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv03354
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, C.O. Murphy, C.O. Lt. Campball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Correction Department, C.O. Ceesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
