Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P.
as 23-7753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO
Defendant / Appellee:
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P., RICHARD B. HARPER, Esq., ROBERT LAWRENCE MAIRER, Esq. and others
Defendant:
MASSAU COUNTY CLERK, Supreme Court of New York
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torres v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 23-781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilfredo Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Department of Justice, Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court - SDNY, Sylvia Hinds-Radix, City of New York Law Department and others
Joseph v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alfred Joseph and Alfred, Esq.
Defendant:
The State of New York, Clerk of Court Records Office and All Parties Devolved and Unmentioned Due to Exculpatory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hirsch v. Wade
as 23-104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elliot M. Hirsch and Elliot Michael Hirsch
Defendant / Appellee:
Carolyne E. Wade, Justice of the Supreme Court State of New York, Letitia James, Attorney General representing the State of New York, James Blain, Deputy Clerk Supreme Court Kings County and others
Carey v. Slaney
as 23-43
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alisa Carey
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Slaney, Justice Michelle, Clerk of Court and others
Brown v. Blinken
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore benefiiciary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore beneficiary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, United States, Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, United States, Heirs & Assignees, Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, SSA, Heirs & Assignees and others
McClain v. United States District Court Southern District of New York et al
as 1:2022cv09895
Plaintiff:
Willie D. McClain
Defendant:
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Clerk of Court J. Michael McMahon and Deputy Clerk of Court of Signature
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
