Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00758
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
WB and B Executive Search v. City of New York
as 24-845
Plaintiff: WB AND B EXECUTIVE SEARCH
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, BRAD LANDER, in his capacity as Comptroller of the City of New York, OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK CITY COMPTROLLER and others
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-297
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant: GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., WELLS FARGO & CO. and others
Defendant / Appellant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-410
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington
as 23-218
Plaintiff / Appellant: 835 Hinesburg Road, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: City of South Burlington, South Burlington City Council, Meaghan Emery and others
Stevenson v. De Blasio
as 22-2032
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eric Stevenson
Defendant / Appellee: Mayor Bill De Blasio, City Council of New York, Commissioner of the Board of Elections of the City of New York and others
Defendant: NYS Attorney General Letitia James
New York SMSA Limited Partnership v. The City of Rye
as 22-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant: New York SMSA Limited Partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless
Defendant / Appellee: The City of Rye, The City of Rye City Council and Kerry Lenihan, Building Inspector (in his official capacity)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?