Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Zaccaria-Becker et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak et al
as 1:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Christina Zaccaria-Becker and Vivian Felipe-Perez
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, The Long Island Railroad Company D/B/A MTA Long Island Railroad, Metropolitan Transportation Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Oval Capital Limited Liability Company et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate/Policy No. 798200, Authority Ref NO B174010045SS22
as 1:2024cv02661
Plaintiff:
OVAL CAPITAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (d/b/a OVAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT) and TIFERET VENTURES, LLC
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE/POLICY NO. 798200, AUTHORITY REF NO B174010045SS22
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
New Mottys Supermarket Ltd. et al v. Vilsack et al
as 7:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
New Mottys Supermarket Ltd., a NY Limited Liability Company d/b/a New Mottys Supermarket, Mordechai Klein and Abraham Klein
Defendant:
Thomas James Vilsack and Anthony Pesini
MANGALPRADAYA, LLC a Connecticut Liability Company d/b/a CORNER MART et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c/o ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
MANGALPRADAYA, LLC a Connecticut Liability Company d/b/a CORNER MART and MEGHAVI JAGADISHBHATI PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c/o ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c/o UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c/o CIVIL PROCESS CLERK US ATTORNEYS OFFICE-DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Fusion Funding v. MI OPS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Fusion Funding, MI OPS LLC d/b/a Jr.'s Hometown Grill & Pub, Restaurant Investments LLC d/b/a Restaurant Investments and others
Defendant:
MI OPS LLC doing business as Jr.'s Hometown Grill & Pub, Restaurant Investments LLC doing business as Restaurant Investments and Fancy Prairie Company doing business as Fancy Prairie Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Shalamberidze v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al
as 1:2023cv08686
Plaintiff:
Besik shalamberidze
Defendant:
Central Garden & Pet Company d/b/a Hopewell Nursery, Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P. and Robert V. Negron, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
National General Insurance et al v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al
as 2:2023cv07126
Plaintiff:
National General Insurance and Michael Porter
Defendant:
Central Garden & Pet Company as assignee of Central Garden & Pet Company d/b/a Aqueon Products, Petsmart LLC, Central Garden & Pet Company doing business as Aqueon Products and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carruyo Escolona v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06408
Plaintiff:
Jhon Cristobal Carruyo Escolona
Defendant:
Liberty Surplus Insurance Company d/b/a Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Surplus Insurance Company doing business as Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
527 Lincoln Place LLC et al v. National Grid USA et al
as 1:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
527 Lincoln Place LLC and 1112 Dean LLC
Defendant:
National Grid USA, The Brooklyn Union Gas Company d/b/a National Grid New York and The Brooklyn Union Gas Company doing business as National Grid New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant:
John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
