Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rech v. Unknown named and quantity of US Marshals et al
as 6:2023cv06152
Plaintiff:
Michael Rech
Defendant:
Unknown Named and Quantity of U.S. Marshals, U.S. Marshal Service, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brochu v. Unknown Acting Commissioner et al
as 2:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brochu
Defendant:
Name Unknown Acting Commissioner, Name Unknown Acting Warden, James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trevathan v. State of Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Core Civic and State of Vermont Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Rayshunn Trevathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Core Civic Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Core Civic Corporation, (Unknown) Hawkins, James Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 6:2020cv06073
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Touchette et al
as 5:2019cv00241
Plaintiff:
Harry Burns
Defendant:
Michael Touchette and Core Civic of Tenn.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tester v. Pallito et al
as 2:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Jane Does, Prison Health Services, Inc., Kevin Oddy and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Ashley Tester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 1:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. USMS et al
as 1:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
USMS, Jay Ovsiovitch, New York Western District Public Defender's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moshir v. Counselor Sauline et al
as 1:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Sauline, Sullivan, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
