Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al v. BASF Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies
Defendant:
BASF Corporation, Insurance Company Of North America, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
First State Insurance Company v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
as 21-30
Counter Claimant:
Swiss Reinsurance America Company, Successor, Forum Insurance Co., ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Central National Insurance Company of Omaha
Defendant:
Doe Insurers, 1 through 10, Columbia Casualty Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
First State Insurance Company and New England Reinsurance Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Successor, Familian Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
American Home Assurance Company, Oakwood Insurance Company, as successor by merger to Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, but only as to policies issued by Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast, and its subsidiaries and Swiss Reinsurance America Company, Successor, Forum Insurance Company
Lynch v. Judicial Branch
as 20-3759
Defendant:
J. Doe, 125 and Doe Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel M. Lynch
Defendant / Appellee:
Green and Gross, P.C., Eric M. Gross, Thomas G. Smith and others
Tamm Consulting v. The Cincinnati Insurance Compa
as 20-1032
Defendant / Appellee:
Turner Engineering, P.C., Turner Forensics, The Cincinnati Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
John Doe Companies, John Does and John Doe Insurance Companies, Whose Names Are Unknown and Who Made Evaluations, Decisions, and Payment or Non-Payment Decisions , including by not Limited to Claims, Damage, Liability, Subrogation, and/or Reinsurance
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Einar Tamm and Tamm Consulting
Tamm Consulting v. The Cincinnati Insurance Compa
as 19-2363
Defendant / Appellee:
Turner Engineering, P.C., Turner Forensics, The Cincinnati Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
John Doe Companies, John Does and John Doe Insurance Companies, Whose Names Are Unknown and Who Made Evaluations, Decisions, and Payment or Non-Payment Decisions , including by not Limited to Claims, Damage, Liability, Subrogation, and/or Reinsurance
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Einar Tamm and Tamm Consulting
Tamm Consulting et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv11415
Plaintiff:
Tamm Consulting and Einar Tamm
Defendant:
Turner Engineering, P.C., The Cincinnati Insurance Company, McClure Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
First State Insurance Company, et al v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01822
Plaintiff:
First State Insurance Company and New England Reinsurance Corp
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc, Columbia Casualty Company, ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Garrett v. Parker et al
as 1:2015cv06951
Defendant:
Estate of Robert H. Parker, John Doe Insurance Co., John Doe, Esq. Insurance Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
AXA Belgium (as successor to Royale Belge) et al v. W.R. Grace & Co. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust et al
as 1:2014cv01700
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company , Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and AXA Belgium (as successor to Royale Belge)
Defendant:
W.R. Grace & Co. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust , Harry Huge , Lewis Sifford and others
Counter_claimant:
W.R. Grace & Co. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust
Counter_defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
